Watch the FULL uncensored interview early — become a VladTV YouTube Member now: https://www.youtube.com/vladtv/join ⸻ Shawn Prez sits down with former Army Ranger sniper Nicholas Irving to break down the escalating geopolitical tensions surrounding Donald Trump, Strait of Hormuz, and Iran. The conversation dives into the strategic importance of the Strait of Hormuz—one of the world’s most critical oil chokepoints—and how recent U.S. actions could impact global energy markets. Irving questions whether Trump’s moves are truly about national security or if they could be tied to stock market manipulation or even distractions from ongoing controversies like the Epstein case. Shawn Prez and Irving also critique Trump’s leadership style, pointing out what they see as inconsistent policies and unpredictable decision-making. They discuss how Trump’s relationships with key figures, including Melania Trump and global leaders like the Pope, reflect broader concerns about his political strategy and messaging. The discussion expands into larger issues of political corruption and insider trading, with both hosts suggesting that powerful figures may be leveraging global conflicts for financial gain. They also analyze how Trump’s actions could affect his political base and raise questions about the long-term stability of his influence. Shifting to global security, Irving highlights the dangers of nuclear proliferation, noting that countries like Russia, China, and Pakistan already possess nuclear weapons. The possibility of Iran joining that list raises serious concerns about regional and global stability. They also point to growing tensions between the U.S. and its traditional allies, including the United Kingdom, suggesting that some nations may be distancing themselves from the conflict. Irving predicts that the coming days could bring further political maneuvering, as the Trump administration looks to strengthen approval ratings ahead of key elections. The conversation concludes with concerns about rising gas prices, the economic impact of war, and whether the U.S. is ultimately searching for an exit strategy. Both hosts warn that the situation could escalate quickly, with serious consequences for both domestic and international stability.